Hi Pavana,
Nice to meet you!
Please find my feedback on your assignment 2's submission below:
- Excellent use of visual aids and presentation skills
- Good indication of stakeholders and their involvement
- Excellent explanation of positive and negative impacts though if done for each identified stakeholder point of view would be more effective
- Good use of ethical framework to justifying your position
- Good research and referencing
- Presentation Duration: 10:31 mins
Regards,
| Criteria | No Pass Less than 50% | Pass 50-59% | Credit 60-69% | Distinction 70-79% | The context and issue are clearly and thoughtfully outlined. | The context and issue are concisely and comprehensively outlined. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Definition and description of context and issue chosen (10%) | Did not meet the criterion. | The context and issue description provides a satisfactory outline but lacks some clarity and specificity. | The context and issue description provide a sound outline. | The context and issue are clearly and thoughtfully outlined. | The context and issue are concisely and comprehensively outlined. | |
| Impact of positive and negative professional and ethical dimensions on all stakeholders including broader society (40%) | Did not meet the criterion. | Satisfactory argument on the impact and significance of the issue but at a superficial level. The analysis and evaluation provide a level on the potential implications of the issue but are supported by minimal evidence. Lacks clarity, detail or specificity. | Sound argument on the impact and significance of the issue. The analysis and evaluation provide a clear position on the potential implications of the issue and are supported by some evidence, however there is limited clarity, detail or specificity. | Clear and thoughtful argument on the impact and significance of the issue. The analysis and evaluation provide a strong position on the potential implications of the issue and are supported by clear detailed and specific evidence. | Conscious and compelling argument on the impact and significance of the issue with a meaningful and insightful exploration of the ethical dilemmas relating to the topic. Rational,渭南维维的, 10% | Conscious and compelling argument on the impact and significance of the issue with a meaningful and insightful exploration of the ethical dilemmas relating to the topic. Rational,渭南维维的, 10% |
| A convincing argument and rationale for the stated position on the chosen issue (40%) | Did not meet the criterion. | The analysis and evaluation provide a basic argument and rationale for your position. The analysis and evaluation are supported by some evidence. Lacks some clarity, detail or specificity. | The analysis and evaluation provide a sound argument and rationale for your position. The analysis and evaluation are supported by some evidence, however there is limited clarity, detail or specificity. | The analysis and evaluation provide a strong argument and rationale for your position. The analysis and evaluation are supported by clear detailed, relevant and specific evidence. | The analysis and evaluation provide a strong argument and rationale for your position. The analysis and evaluation are supported by clear, very detailed, highly relevant and specific evidence. | |
| Video presentation | Did not meet the criterion. | Generally understandable presentation with a somewhat clear structure including a basic introduction and conclusion. | Uses somewhat clear and mostly relevant language. Clearly structured including an acceptable introduction and conclusion. | Uses clear and relevant language. Clearly structured including a well-thought-out introduction. | Uses clearly and highly relevant language. Cohensively structured, including a well-thought-out introduction. | Has clear and highly relevant language. Cohensively structured, including a well-thought-out introduction. |
| Presentation is engaging and innovative for the intended audience, clear, engages the audience and generates enthusiasm. | Did not meet the criterion. | Generally accurate spelling and grammar but has some errors. | Uses somewhat clear and mostly relevant language. Clearly structured including an acceptable introduction and conclusion. | Uses clear and thoughtfully presented. Accurate spelling and grammar with a few errors. | Uses clearly and thoughtfully presented. Accurate spelling and grammar with little to no errors. | Uses clearly and thoughtfully presented. Accurate spelling and grammar with little to no errors. |
| Correct referencing, grammar and spelling (10%) | Did not meet the criterion. | Visually appealing with speaker visible. No innovation was shown. | Visually appealing with speaker visible. Considered audience needs and engagement, generates enthusiasm. Displays creativity but falls short of groundbreaking innovation. | Maximised audience engagement, attempting to establish a personal connection. Generating an interest and enthusiasm about the topic in others. Innovative approach to getting content across. | Maximised audience engagement, establishing a personal connection, generating a strong interest showcases exceptional creativity and introduces novel approaches ground breaking ideas. | Maximised audience engagement, establishing a personal connection, and generating a strong interest showcases exceptional creativity and introduces novel approaches ground breaking ideas. |
| Correct referencing, grammar and spelling (10%) | Did not meet the criterion. | Visually appealing with speaker visible. No innovation was shown. | Visually appealing with speaker visible. Considered audience needs and engagement, generates enthusiasm. Displays creativity but falls short of groundbreaking innovation. | Correct APA referencing. | Correct APA referencing. | Correct APA referencing. |